Analytic methods for two‐stage case‐control studies and other stratified designs
- 1 May 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 10 (5) , 739-747
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780100509
Abstract
Nested case‐control studies, or case‐control studies within a cohort, combine the advantages of cohort studies with the efficiency of case‐control studies. Case‐control studies can often be viewed as having two stages; the first stage consists of vital status, disease, and basic covariate ascertainment, and the second stage consists of detailed covariate and exposure ascertainment. Breslow and Cain (1988) and Breslow and Zhao (1988) recently showed that conventional analyses of such two‐stage studies may ignore some of the available information. In this paper, we show how one can adapt the pseudo‐likelihood analyses developed by Kalbfleisch and Lawless (1988) to the analysis of data from two‐stage case‐control studies.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Estimation of risk ratios in case‐base studies with competing risksStatistics in Medicine, 1990
- Likelihood analysis of multi‐state models for disease incidence and mortalityStatistics in Medicine, 1988
- Estimation of exposure-specific rates from sparse case-control dataJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1986
- Adjustment of risk ratios in case-base studies (hybrid epidemiologic designs)Statistics in Medicine, 1986
- Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear modelsBiometrika, 1986
- Estimation of Response Probabilities from Augmented Retrospective ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1985
- Multivariate estimation of exposure-specific incidence from case-control studiesJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1981