The Excluded Variable Problem in Nonrandomized Control Group Designs
- 1 August 1984
- journal article
- other
- Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation Review
- Vol. 8 (4) , 559-572
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x8400800406
Abstract
A solution to the problem of specification error due to excluded variables in statistical models of treatment effects in nonrandomized (nonequivalent) control group designs is presented. The solution relies upon longitudinal observation involving at least two pre tests. The assumptions of a single equation probit model for selection bias, structural invariance, and a first order autoregressive pattern are sufficient to identify the model and treatment effect—with one overidentifying restriction. The estimate of the treatment effect is adjusted for an unmeasured variable that influences both the dependent variable and the selection of cases into treatment and control groups. A small simulation suggests that the use of a ML estimation program such as LISREL, which assumes multivariate normality and linearity, may provide reasonable estimates of treatment effects.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Selectivity Problems in Quasi-Experimental StudiesEvaluation Review, 1983
- Sample Selection Bias as a Specification ErrorEconometrica, 1979
- A Head Start ReevaluationEvaluation Quarterly, 1978
- Toward a Causal Model Approach for Adjusting for Preexisting Differences in the Nonequivalent Control Group SituationEvaluation Quarterly, 1977
- A quasi-experimental approach to assessing treatment effects in the nonequivalent control group design.Psychological Bulletin, 1975
- Making the Case for Randomized Assignment to Treatments by Considering the Alternatives: Six Ways in Which Quasi-Experimental Evaluations In Compensatory Education Tend to Underestimate EffectsPublished by Elsevier ,1975