Do Dressings Influence the Healing of Chronic Venous Ulcers?
- 24 June 1988
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Phlebology: The Journal of Venous Disease
- Vol. 3 (2) , 129-134
- https://doi.org/10.1177/026835558800300210
Abstract
One hundred and twenty venous ulcers with a mean duration of 26.25 ± 2.6 months were treated as out-patients using a standard graduated compression bandage. To assess the effects of different types of dressing they were randomized to either a non-adherent dressing (NA, Johnson & Johnson, n = 60), an occlusive dressing (Granuflex, Squibb Surgicare, n = 30) or a dressing with silver sulphadiazine added (Flamazine, Smith & Nephew, n = 30). Ulcer size, duration and the patient's age were similar in the three groups. There was no significant difference in healing between the groups with 47 out of 60 (78%) with NA dressings, 22 out of 30 (73%) with Granuflex and 19 out of 30 (63%) treated with Flamazine healed within 12 weeks. Neither topical antimicrobial agents or occlusive dressings improved the excellent rate of healing achieved by carefully applied graduated compression bandaging.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Changes in the apparently normal limb in unilateral venous ulcerationBritish Journal of Surgery, 1987
- Pinch skin grafting or porcine dermis in venous ulcers: a randomised clinical trial.BMJ, 1987
- Leg ulcers: Epidemiology and aetiologyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1986
- Dressings for leg ulcersDrug and Therapeutics Bulletin, 1986
- The effect of antiseptics on the healing wound: A study using the rabbit ear chamberBritish Journal of Surgery, 1985
- The effect of occlusive dressings on collagen synthesis and re-epithelialization in superficial woundsJournal of Surgical Research, 1983
- Venous ulceration.BMJ, 1983
- THE CAUSE OF VENOUS ULCERATIONThe Lancet, 1982