Use of Self-Generated and Supplied Visuals as Mnemonics in Gifted Children's Learning
- 1 August 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perceptual and Motor Skills
- Vol. 57 (1) , 235-240
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1983.57.1.235
Abstract
In accordance with ancient belief and recent research, we hypothesized that self-generated imagery techniques of gifted children would be superior to supplied (experimenter-provided) visuals in facilitating recall and recognition on a memory task. 27 high-potential students in Grades 4 to 6 were divided into three treatment groups to investigate the effects of rote repetition, self-generated visualization, and supplied visuals on the memorization of concrete noun-word pairs. Perhaps because even gifted children do not know how to construct good visual images without training and practice, our hypothesis was not supported. The supplied visual condition produced significantly better results than did either of the other treatment conditions, implying that the utilization of appropriate techniques helps gifted children learn certain memory tasks. However, one wonders if effective instruction in the development of self-generated mnemonic techniques might not be of greater benefit to young learners of such tasks.This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mnemonic Devices: Classification, Characteristics, and CriteriaReview of Educational Research, 1981
- Recent Research on Visual Mnemonics: Historical Roots and Educational FruitsReview of Educational Research, 1979
- On pictures in proseECTJ, 1978
- The picture in your mindEducational Technology Research and Development, 1977
- Spontaneous Use of Mnemonics and Grade Point AverageThe Journal of Psychology, 1976
- Comprehension and recall of sentences.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969
- Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968
- The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.Psychological Review, 1956