The Unique Correspondence of the Item Response Function and Item Category Response Functions in Polytomously Scored Item Response Models
- 1 September 1994
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Psychometrika
- Vol. 59 (3) , 391-404
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02296132
Abstract
The item response function (IRF) for a polytomously scored item is defined as a weighted sum of the item category response functions (ICRF, the probability of getting a particular score for a randomly sampled examinee of ability θ). This paper establishes the correspondence between an IRF and a unique set of ICRFs for two of the most commonly used polytomous IRT models (the partial credit models and the graded response model). Specifically, a proof of the following assertion is provided for these models: If two items have the same IRF, then they must have the same number of categories; moreover, they must consist of the same ICRFs. As a corollary, for the Rasch dichotomous model, if two tests have the same test characteristic function (TCF), then they must have the same number of items. Moreover, for each item in one of the tests, an item in the other test with an identical IRF must exist. Theoretical as well as practical implications of these results are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Model-Based Standardization Approach that Separates True Bias/DIF from Group Ability Differences and Detects Test Bias/DTF as well as Item Bias/DIFPsychometrika, 1993
- The Partial Credit Model and Null CategoriesPsychometrika, 1993
- A Generalized Partial Credit Model: Application of an EM AlgorithmApplied Psychological Measurement, 1992
- A Taxonomy of Item Response ModelsPsychometrika, 1986
- A Rasch Model for Partial Credit ScoringPsychometrika, 1982
- A Rating Formulation for Ordered Response CategoriesPsychometrika, 1978
- Estimating Item Parameters and Latent Ability when Responses are Scored in Two or More Nominal CategoriesPsychometrika, 1972
- Estimation of Latent Ability Using a Response Pattern of Graded ScoresPsychometrika, 1969