Implantable power-sources: a review
- 1 January 1984
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology
- Vol. 8 (2) , 56-63
- https://doi.org/10.3109/03091908409036744
Abstract
It has now been 25 years since the first pacemakers were implanted. It is indeed fascinating to see the breadth and the vision of the early investigators on both sides of the ocean, most of them friends of the author, in the almost desperate search for a power source that would enable the pacemaker to last as long as the expected lifetime of the average patient. Every conceivable method of power generation, power storage, and energy conservation was studied. The result was an orderly transition from zinc-mercury batteries, to lithium-iodine batteries, to the newest lithium oxyhalide systems of the coming decade, all of which coincided with tentative sidesteps into rechargeable batteries and nuclear batteries. This paper traces this 25 years of progress and salutes the many investigators who have brought the implantable pacemaker and its power source to their present state of acceptance by the medical profession.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Transtelephone Pacemaker Monitoring: Five Years LaterThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1975
- A Pu238O2 Nuclear Power Source for Implantable Cardiac PacemakersIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1973
- The Solid-State Lithium Battery: A New Improved Chemical Power Source for Implantable Cardiac PacemakersIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1971
- A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR INTERNAL CARDIAC PACINGThe Lancet, 1963
- Balanced Alkaline Dry CellsTransactions of The Electrochemical Society, 1947