Forage Legume Effects on Soil Nitrogen and Grain Yield, and Nitrogen Nutrition of Wheat
- 1 May 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Agronomy Journal
- Vol. 81 (3) , 419-424
- https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1989.00021962008100030004x
Abstract
Information on the effect of hayed legumes on soil fertility and subsequent crop productivity is needed to evaluate the use of legumes in place of summerfallow in the northern Great Plains. The objectives of these studies were to determine (i) the seeding‐year hay yield, and root and crown N content of five forage legumes, (ii) the spring soil NO−3‐N status following the forage legumes, and (iii) the forage legume effects on grain yield, grain yield components, and N nutrition of the subsequent hard red spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) crop at 0, 75, or 150 kg of fertilizer N ha‐1. Field experiments were conducted on a Fargo silty clay (fine, montmorillonitic, frigid Vertic Haplaquolls) soil at Fargo, ND and on a Perella‐Bearden silty clay loam (fine‐silty, mixed, frigid Typic Haplaquolls, fine‐silty, frigid Aeric Calciaquolls) soil at Prosper, ND from 1984 to 1986. The legume species were not significantly different in hay yields, and root and crown N content across environments, although alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and sweetclover [Melilotus officinalis (L.) Lam.] had 35 to 83% greater N contents than other species. Fall regrowth, crowns, and roots were incorporated into the soil in late fall. Soil NO−3‐N in the spring following legumes was greater than following fertilized wheat, but less than following fallow across environments. Grain yield and N uptake of wheat following forage legumes generally were equal to those following fallow, but greater than those following wheat. Nitrogen use efficiency of unfertilized wheat following forage legumes was greater than following fallow or wheat in 1986, but equal in 1985. Grain yield to total N uptake ratio and N partitioning to grain following legumes were greater than following fallow or wheat in two of four environments. These results suggest that including 1‐yr forage legumes in crop sequence would be a better option than fallow in the higher moisture areas of the northern Great Plains.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nitrogen Utilization from Fertilizer and Legume Residues in Legume‐Corn Rotations 1Agronomy Journal, 1987
- Nitrogen Contribution to Succeeding Corn from Alfalfa and Red Clover1Agronomy Journal, 1987
- Winter Legumes as a Nitrogen Source for No‐Till Grain Sorghum1Agronomy Journal, 1986
- Alfalfa Dry Matter and Nitrogen Production, and Fertilizer Nitrogen Response in Legume‐Corn Rotations1Agronomy Journal, 1986
- Nitrogen from Forage Legumes: Harvest and Tillage Effects1Agronomy Journal, 1985
- EFFECTS OF FORAGE LEGUME SPECIES ON SOIL MOISTURE, NITROGEN, AND YIELD OF SUCCEEDING BARLEY CROPSCanadian Journal of Soil Science, 1983
- Nitrogen Uptake by Spring Wheat, Soil Distribution, and Recovery of N Fertilizer from Alternate Crop‐fallow and Recrop Field Management Systems1Agronomy Journal, 1981
- Legume and Mineral N Effects on Crop Yields in Several Crop Sequences in the Upper Mississippi Valley1Agronomy Journal, 1981
- Manure and Mineral Fertilizer Effects in Continuous and Rotational Crop Sequences in Central New York1Agronomy Journal, 1980
- Winter‐Annual Cover Crops for No‐Tillage Corn Production1Agronomy Journal, 1977