Does stereopsis matter in humans?
- 1 March 1996
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Eye
- Vol. 10 (2) , 233-238
- https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1996.51
Abstract
Stereopsis has been one of the most popular fields of vision research for well over a century and is routinely measured in clinical practice, yet its functional significance has been largely neglected. Stereopsis is disrupted by blur, amblyopia and strabismus and is of potential value as a means of indirect screening for visual disorders in childhood. However, evidence for the functional effects of stereoscopic deficits is sparse. Recent investigations indicate that binocularity is an advantage in certain tasks, especially in the comprehension of complex visual presentations and those requiring good hand—eye coordination. The assumption derived from the evolutionary theory that stereopsis represents an adaptation by primates to arboreal life needs to be questioned. While the functional aspects of stereopsis are still not fully understood the direction that future research should take to unravel this important issue is apparent.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- A simple eyesight screening programme for dental undergraduates: Results after 7 yearsAustralian Dental Journal, 1993
- Colour Inputs to Random-Dot StereopsisPerception, 1992
- Results of early surgery for infantile esotropia in normal and neurologically impaired infantsEye, 1992
- The relationship between stereopsis and fine manual dexterity: Pilot study of a new instrumentEye, 1991
- Effect of Induced Blur on Visual Acuity and StereoacuityOptometry and Vision Science, 1991
- Living with one eyeBMJ, 1987
- Personal ViewBMJ, 1987
- Stereoscopic Threshold in Children and AdultsOptometry and Vision Science, 1985
- REVIEWSJournal of Semitic Studies, 1985
- NEURODEVELOPMENTAL SCREENING IN THE SCHOOL-ENTRANT MEDICAL EXAMINATIONThe Lancet, 1973