Management of women with atypical Papanicolaou tests of undetermined significance by board-certified gynecologists: Discrepancies with published guidelines
- 1 September 2001
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 185 (3) , 551-556
- https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2001.116725
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Controversies in the management of ASCUS and AGCUS: two very different beastsCurrent Problems in Obstetrics, Gynecology and Fertility, 2001
- ASCCP Practice Guidelines Management Guidelines for the Follow-up of Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance (ASCUS)Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, 2000
- Human Papillomavirus Testing for Triage of Women With Cytologic Evidence of Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions: Baseline Data From a Randomized TrialJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000
- Why Don't Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines?JAMA, 1999
- Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: Management patterns at an academic medical centerAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1998
- ASCCP Practice CommitteeJournal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, 1997
- Interim Guidelines for Management of Abnormal Cervical CytologyJAMA, 1994
- Does the system of Papanicolaou test nomenclature affect the rate of referral for colposcopy? A survey of family physiciansArchives of Family Medicine, 1993
- Rapid Communication—The Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical/Vaginal Cytologic Diagnoses—Report of the 1991 Bethesda WorkshopJAMA, 1992
- The 1988 Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical/Vaginal Cytological DiagnosesJAMA, 1989