Policy Learning and Uncertainty: The Case of Pension Reform in Estonia and Latvia
- 19 October 2003
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Policy Studies Journal
- Vol. 31 (4) , 643-660
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-0072.00047
Abstract
This article addresses the question, under what conditions does the need for urgent solutions to societal problems lead to transferring a policy designed for another political system? The argument developed in the article is based on the theoretical frameworks of learning and historical institutionalism. I have posited that the urgent need for quick solutions to existing policy problems is a catalyst for policy transfer only if there is not enough prior successful experience with self‐designed policy reforms. The theoretical argument is tested using the case of pension reform in Estonia and Latvia, which proves to be difficult to explain with the arguments in the existing policy transfer literature.This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Old-age Security in the Baltics: Legacy, Early Reforms and Recent TrendsEurope-Asia Studies, 2002
- Interstate Professional Associations and the Diffusion of Policy InnovationsAmerican Politics Research, 2001
- Policy Networks and Innovation Diffusion: The Case of State Education ReformsThe Journal of Politics, 1998
- Who Learns What from Whom: A Review of the Policy Transfer LiteraturePolitical Studies, 1996
- Understanding Cross National Policy Transfers: The Case of Britain and the USGovernance, 1992
- State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History AnalysisAmerican Political Science Review, 1990
- Temporal and Spatial Diffusion in the Comparative Analysis of Social ChangeAmerican Political Science Review, 1980
- Confusion, Diffusion, and InnovationAmerican Political Science Review, 1977
- Variations in Elite Perceptions of American States as Referents for Public Policy MakingAmerican Political Science Review, 1975
- Innovation in the States: A Diffusion StudyAmerican Political Science Review, 1973