Contribution of relative growth rate to root foraging by annual and perennial grasses from California oak woodlands
- 1 August 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Oecologia
- Vol. 136 (3) , 424-430
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1275-7
Abstract
Plants forage for nutrients by increasing their root length density (RLD) in nutrient-rich soil microsites through root morphological changes resulting in increased root biomass density (RBD), specific root length (SRL), or branching frequency (BF). It is commonly accepted that fast-growing species will forage more than slow-growing species. However, foraging responses may be due solely to differences in relative growth rates (RGR). There is little evidence, after the effects of RGR are removed, that the fast versus slow foraging theory is correct. In a pot study, we evaluated foraging of four grass species that differed in RGR: one fast-growing annual species, Bromus diandrus, two intermediate-growing species, annual Bromus hordeaceus and perennial Elymus glaucus, and one slow-growing perennial species, Nassella pulchra. We harvested plants either at a common time (plants varied in size) or at a common leaf number (plants similar size, surrogate for common biomass). By evaluating species at a common time, RGR influenced foraging. Conversely, by evaluating species at a common leaf number, foraging could be evaluated independent of RGR. When RGR was allowed to contribute to foraging (common time harvest), foraging and RGR were positively correlated. B. diandrus (fast RGR) foraged to a greater extent than did E. glaucus (intermediate RGR) and N. pulchra (slow RGR). E. glaucus (intermediate RGR) foraged to a greater extent than N. pulchra (slow RGR). Root growth within nutrient-rich microsites was due to significant increases in RBD, not to modifications of SRL or BF. However, when RGR was not allowed to influence foraging (common leaf number harvest), none of the four species significantly enhanced RLD in nutrient-rich compared to control microsites. This suggests that RGR strongly influenced the ability of these grass species to forage and also supports the need to evaluate plastic root traits independent of RGR.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Foraging for nutrients, responses to changes in light, and competition in tropical deciduous tree seedlingsOecologia, 1998
- Root morphological plasticity and nutrient acquisition of perennial grass species from habitats of different nutrient availabilityOecologia, 1998
- The effects of shading and N status on root proliferation in nutrient patches by the perennial grass Agropyron desertorum in the fieldOecologia, 1995
- Interpreting phenotypic variation in plantsTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 1994
- Phenotypic plasticity in response to nitrate supply of an inherently fast-growing species from a fertile habitat and an inherently slow-growing species from an infertile habitatOecologia, 1993
- Fine root growth and demographic responses to nutrient patches in four old-field plant speciesOecologia, 1993
- Elevated CO2 and plant nitrogen-use: is reduced tissue nitrogen concentration size-dependent?Oecologia, 1993
- Shading and the capture of localized soil nutrients: nutrient contents, carbohydrates, and root uptake kinetics of a perennial tussock grassOecologia, 1992