Mortality from abortion and childbirth. Are the statistics biased?
- 9 July 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 248 (2) , 192-196
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.248.2.192
Abstract
Critics have challenged previous comparisons of mortality from legal abortion and childbirth for containing biases in the crude data that spuriously favor the safety of abortion. To evaluate this concern, the sources of mortality data on which these comparisons are based were reviewed and the completeness of abortion mortality statistics, the completeness of childbirth mortality statistics, and the accuracy of the denominators for both these events were examined. The evidence was consisitent in 2 directions: abortion deaths appear to be more completely ascertained than childbirth deaths; use of different denominator estimates has relatively little impact on the comparison. The crude data are biased in a direction that overestimates the abortion risks for the women relative to the risks of childbearing.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- HYDATIDIFORM MOLE IN THE UNITED STATES (1970–1977): A STATISTICAL AND THEORETICAL ANALYSIS1American Journal of Epidemiology, 1982
- The risk of childbearing re-evaluated.American Journal of Public Health, 1981
- Gestational trophoblastic disease within an elective abortion populationAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1979
- ASSESSMENT OF SURVEILLANCE AND VITAL STATISTICS DATA FOR MONITORING ABORTION MORTALITY, UNITED STATES, 1972–1975American Journal of Epidemiology, 1978
- THE REPORTING OF COMMUNICABLE DISEASESAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1977
- INTENSIVE HEPATITIS SURVEILLANCE IN MINNESOTA: METHODS AND RESULTSAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1977
- Legal abortion mortality in the United States. Epidemiologic surveillance, 1972-1974JAMA, 1977