Verapamil and propranolol in essential hypertension
- 1 December 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
- Vol. 36 (6) , 750-758
- https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.1984.253
Abstract
Twenty-four subjects with mild to moderate essential hypertension completed this 9-wk parallel, randomized, double-blind study of the antihypertensive effects of verapamil (V) (240-480 mg%) and propranolol (P) (120 to 360 mg%). V lowered systolic and diastolic blood pressures in all postural positions, with an average reduction of 20/16 mm Hg. With the exception of standing systolic blood pressure, P also lowered systolic and diastolic blood pressures in all postural positions, with an average reduction of 9/11 mm Hg. Differences between V and P were significant only for sitting systolic blood pressure. Heart rate was decreased by P but was not affected by V. The PR interval was prolonged by V. Plasma levels of V and P were directly related to dose. Plasma levels of V were linearly related to those of its major metabolite, norverapamil (r = 0.81). There was no correlation between clinical response and the dose or plasma level of V or P, but all subjects who received 480 mg% V had an average blood pressure reduction of 20/16 mm Hg and plasma levels of the parent drug above 200 ng/ml. V is evidently an effective antihypertensive for mild to moderate essential hypertension. Constipation, pedal edema, and a maculopapular rash were reported as side effects of V.This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Calcium, Vascular Smooth Muscle, and Calcium Entry Blockers in HypertensionAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1983
- COMPARISON OF PROPRANOLOL AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE FOR THE INITIAL TREATMENT OF HYPERTENSION .2. RESULTS OF LONG-TERM THERAPY1982
- Reduced verapamil clearance during long-term oral administrationClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1981
- Verapamil in the Management of Hypertensive PatientsAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine, 1979