Legal Origins: Reconciling Law & Finance and Comparative Law
- 1 July 2007
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
Law and finance scholars have increasingly relied upon comparative law in the last few years. The work of these scholars has considered, in empirical terms, the effect that legal rules and their enforcement have on financial development in different countries. These studies have routinely adopted the traditional distinction between civil law and common law countries. Whether this revival of legal families (or legal origins) is a useful way forward is, however, a matter of debate. The author challenges the methodology these studies adopt and argues instead for reliance on characteristic features of national legal systems, as distinct from systemic origins, as a basis for analysis.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ibid.Published by JSTOR ,2018
- Basis on German Disaster Management LawLocal Government Law Journal, 2016
- ARALIA, UDO (Aralia cordata)Udo (Aralia cordata)Published by Springer Nature ,2008
- Shareholder Protection in the USA and Germany - “Law and Finance” RevisitedGerman Law Journal, 2006
- The Real Difference in Corporate Law between the United States and Continental Europe: Distribution of PowersSSRN Electronic Journal, 2004
- Law and finance: why does legal origin matter?Journal of Comparative Economics, 2003
- CourtsThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2003
- The Regulation of EntryThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2002
- The quality of governmentJournal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 1999
- Corporacion del Cobre v. Braden Copper Corporation and Société Groupement d'Importation des MétauxInternational Law Reports, 1984