Landslide triggering by rain infiltration
Top Cited Papers
- 1 July 2000
- journal article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Water Resources Research
- Vol. 36 (7) , 1897-1910
- https://doi.org/10.1029/2000wr900090
Abstract
Landsliding in response to rainfall involves physical processes that operate on disparate timescales. Relationships between these timescales guide development of a mathematical model that uses reduced forms of Richards equation to evaluate effects of rainfall infiltration on landslide occurrence, timing, depth, and acceleration in diverse situations. The longest pertinent timescale is A/D0, where D0 is the maximum hydraulic diffusivity of the soil and A is the catchment area that potentially affects groundwater pressures at a prospective landslide slip surface location with areal coordinates x, y and depth H. Times greater than A/D0 are necessary for establishment of steady background water pressures that develop at (x, y, H) in response to rainfall averaged over periods that commonly range from days to many decades. These steady groundwater pressures influence the propensity for landsliding at (x, y, H), but they do not trigger slope failure. Failure results from rainfall over a typically shorter timescale H2/D0 associated with transient pore pressure transmission during and following storms. Commonly, this timescale ranges from minutes to months. The shortest timescale affecting landslide responses to rainfall is , where g is the magnitude of gravitational acceleration. Postfailure landslide motion occurs on this timescale, which indicates that the thinnest landslides accelerate most quickly if all other factors are constant. Effects of hydrologic processes on landslide processes across these diverse timescales are encapsulated by a response function, , which depends only on normalized time, t*. Use of R(t*) in conjunction with topographic data, rainfall intensity and duration information, an infinite‐slope failure criterion, and Newton's second law predicts the timing, depth, and acceleration of rainfall‐triggered landslides. Data from contrasting landslides that exhibit rapid, shallow motion and slow, deep‐seated motion corroborate these predictions.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- The capillary fringe and its effect on water-table responsePublished by Elsevier ,2003
- Unsaturated zone processes and the hydrologic response of a steep, unchanneled catchmentWater Resources Research, 1998
- The physics of debris flowsReviews of Geophysics, 1997
- Hydrologic response of a steep, unchanneled valley to natural and applied rainfallWater Resources Research, 1997
- A Pore-Pressure Diffusion Model for Estimating Landslide-Inducing RainfallThe Journal of Geology, 1994
- A physically based model for the topographic control on shallow landslidingWater Resources Research, 1994
- A Closed‐form Equation for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated SoilsSoil Science Society of America Journal, 1980
- The Rainfall Intensity: Duration Control of Shallow Landslides and Debris FlowsGeografiska Annaler: Series A, Physical Geography, 1980
- Theory of Propagation of Elastic Waves in a Fluid-Saturated Porous Solid. I. Low-Frequency RangeThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1956
- CAPILLARY CONDUCTION OF LIQUIDS THROUGH POROUS MEDIUMSJournal of Applied Physics, 1931