Knowledge of the legislation governing proxy consent to treatment and research
Open Access
- 1 February 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Medical Ethics
- Vol. 29 (1) , 44-50
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.29.1.44
Abstract
Objective:To assess the knowledge of four groups of individuals regarding who is legally authorised to consent to health care or research involving older patients.Design:A provincewide postal survey.Setting:Province of Quebec, Canada.Participants:Three hundred older adults, 434 informal caregivers of cognitively impaired individuals, 98 researchers in aging and 136 members of research ethics boards (REBs).Measurements:Knowledge was assessed through a pretested postal questionnaire comprising five vignettes that describe hypothetical situations involving an older adult who requires medical care or is solicited for research. The respondent had to identify the person who is legally authorised to provide consent.Results:Nearly 80% of all respondents provided the correct answer when the hypothetical scenario depicted a person who was competent to consent or incompetent but legally represented. Knowledge was worse (from 2% among older adults to 44% among REB members) for the scenario describing a research situation that involved an incompetent adult without a legal guardian.Conclusion:The observed lack of knowledge raises doubts about the ability of current legislation to truly protect the rights of older adults with diminished decision making capacity. It points to the need for educational programmes aimed at increasing public awareness of the legislation put in place for those requiring special protection.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are Persons With Cognitive Impairment Able to State Consistent Choices?The Gerontologist, 2001
- Preferences for Surrogate Decision Makers, Informal Communication, and Advance Directives Among Community-Dwelling EldersThe Gerontologist, 2000
- Informed Consent for ResearchAnesthesiology, 1999
- Are Research Ethics Bad for Our Mental Health?New England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Ethical and Human-Rights Issues in Research on Mental Disorders That May Affect Decision-Making CapacityNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Updating Protections for Human Subjects Involved in ResearchJAMA, 1998
- Informed ConsentAnesthesiology, 1997
- Refusal and information bias associated with postal questionnaires and face-to-face interviews in very elderly subjectsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1996
- General practitioners' knowledge and use ofliving willsBMJ, 1995
- Assessing Patients' Capacities to Consent to TreatmentNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988