Strategy and Background in Congressional Campaigns
- 1 March 1998
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 92 (1) , 159-171
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2585935
Abstract
Common conceptions of the electoral connection often make two assumptions about the behavior of candidates and voters. The first is that candidates focus their campaigns on their records. The second is that voters evaluate candidates on the basis of their campaign messages. This article explores how candidates' backgrounds influence these two components of representation. The main premise is simple: Campaign messages are more effective if they emphasize issues on which candidates have built a record that appears favorable to voters. Consequently, candidates tend to focus on this type of issue when choosing campaign themes. Candidates are less successful in winning favorable evaluations if they stray from their records and make unsubstantiated claims.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case StudyAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1996
- Modeling Negative CampaigningAmerican Political Science Review, 1995
- Riding the Wave and Claiming Ownership Over Issues: The Joint Effects of Advertising and News Coverage in CampaignsPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1994
- Sacrificial Lambs or Strategic Politicians? Political Amateurs in U.S. House ElectionsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1993
- Errors in Measuring Vote Choice in the National Election Studies, 1952-88American Journal of Political Science, 1993
- Ideology, Interest Group Scores, and Legislative VotesAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1992
- A Spatial Theory of IdeologyJournal of Theoretical Politics, 1992
- Eschewing Obfuscation? Campaigns and the Perception of U.S. Senate IncumbentsAmerican Political Science Review, 1991
- Public Judgments of Senate and House CandidatesLegislative Studies Quarterly, 1990
- The Strategy of Ambiguity: Uncertainty and Electoral CompetitionAmerican Political Science Review, 1972