A New Test of Attention in Listening (TAIL) Predicts Auditory Performance
Open Access
- 31 December 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 7 (12) , e53502
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053502
Abstract
Attention modulates auditory perception, but there are currently no simple tests that specifically quantify this modulation. To fill the gap, we developed a new, easy-to-use test of attention in listening (TAIL) based on reaction time. On each trial, two clearly audible tones were presented sequentially, either at the same or different ears. The frequency of the tones was also either the same or different (by at least two critical bands). When the task required same/different frequency judgments, presentation at the same ear significantly speeded responses and reduced errors. A same/different ear (location) judgment was likewise facilitated by keeping tone frequency constant. Perception was thus influenced by involuntary orienting of attention along the task-irrelevant dimension. When information in the two stimulus dimensions were congruent (same-frequency same-ear, or different-frequency different-ear), response was faster and more accurate than when they were incongruent (same-frequency different-ear, or different-frequency same-ear), suggesting the involvement of executive control to resolve conflicts. In total, the TAIL yielded five independent outcome measures: (1) baseline reaction time, indicating information processing efficiency, (2) involuntary orienting of attention to frequency and (3) location, and (4) conflict resolution for frequency and (5) location. Processing efficiency and conflict resolution accounted for up to 45% of individual variances in the low- and high-threshold variants of three psychoacoustic tasks assessing temporal and spectral processing. Involuntary orientation of attention to the irrelevant dimension did not correlate with perceptual performance on these tasks. Given that TAIL measures are unlikely to be limited by perceptual sensitivity, we suggest that the correlations reflect modulation of perceptual performance by attention. The TAIL thus has the power to identify and separate contributions of different components of attention to auditory perception.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is “Inhibition of Return” due to the inhibition of the return of attention?The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2013
- The Attention System of the Human Brain: 20 Years AfterAnnual Review of Neuroscience, 2012
- The Ear Is Connected to the Brain: Some New Directions in the Study of Children with Cochlear Implants at Indiana UniversityJournal of the American Academy of Audiology, 2012
- Temporal Processing in Low-Frequency Channels: Effects of Age and Hearing Loss in Middle-Aged ListenersJournal of the American Academy of Audiology, 2011
- Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test BatteryJournal of Visualized Experiments, 2010
- The Reorienting System of the Human Brain: From Environment to Theory of MindNeuron, 2008
- A dual-networks architecture of top-down controlTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 2008
- Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 2003
- Testing the Efficiency and Independence of Attentional NetworksJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2002
- Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two EarsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1953