Why are different features central for natural kinds and artifacts?: the role of causal status in determining feature centrality
Open Access
- 1 December 1998
- Vol. 69 (2) , 135-178
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00063-8
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Feature Centrality and Conceptual CoherenceCognitive Science, 1998
- Essentialism, word use, and conceptsCognition, 1996
- Knowledge Structures and Linear Separability: Integrating Information in Object and Social CategorizationCognitive Psychology, 1995
- Essentialist beliefs in children: The acquisition of concepts and theoriesPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1994
- Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning.Psychological Review, 1994
- PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computersBehavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 1993
- Do artifact concepts have cores?Journal of Memory and Language, 1992
- Defining features of natural kinds and artifactsJournal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1989
- Systems of correlations in rule and category learning: Use of structured input in learning syntactic categoriesLanguage and Cognitive Processes, 1989
- Context theory of classification learning.Psychological Review, 1978