Modeling ground heat flux in land surface parameterization schemes
- 27 April 1999
- journal article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Vol. 104 (D8) , 9581-9600
- https://doi.org/10.1029/98jd02307
Abstract
A new ground heat flux parameterization for land surface schemes, such as those used in climate and numerical weather prediction models, is described. Compared with other approaches that lump the canopy layer and ground surface, or empirically based approaches that consider the effect of radiation attenuation through the canopy layer, the new parameterization has several advantages. First, the reduction of radiation available for conducting soil surface exchange under vegetated areas is represented in a manner that assures that heat is conserved in the long term. Second, problems in representing properly the phase of the ground heat flux are alleviated. Finally, the approach is relatively simple and is computationally efficient, requiring only two soil thermal layers. Comparison of the method with analytical solutions for special cases shows that the new method approximates the analytical solution very well for different conditions, and that the new method is superior to the force‐restore and the Crank‐Nicholson method. Model‐derived ground heat heat fluxes for the French HAPEX‐MOBILHY (Hydrology‐Atmosphere Pilot Experiment ‐ Modelisation de Bilan Hydrique) site and the Brazilian ABRACOS (Anglo‐Brazilian Amazonian Climate Observation Study) cleared ranch land site are shown to be in close agreement with observations. Sensitivity analyses show that if the attenuation of radiation under vegetation and soil heat storage are ignored, the daytime peak and nighttime minima of ground heat flux, latent and sensible heat fluxes, and surface temperature can be significantly in error. In particular, neglecting the radiation attenuation through the canopy layer can result in significant overestimation (underestimation) of daytime (nighttime) ground heat flux, while neglecting soil heat storage can result in significant phase errors.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cabauw Experimental Results from the Project for Intercomparison of Land-Surface Parameterization SchemesJournal of Climate, 1997
- Modeling of land surface evaporation by four schemes and comparison with FIFE observationsJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1996
- The Simulation of Surface Heat Fluxes in a Land Surface–Atmosphere ModelJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 1995
- The Project for Intercomparison of Land Surface Parameterization Schemes (PILPS): Phases 2 and 3Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 1995
- Comparison between the land surface response of the ECMWF model and the FIFE-1987 dataQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 1993
- Parameterization of Land-Surface Processes in Numerical Weather PredictionPublished by Springer Nature ,1991
- A Critical Assessment of the Samer Network AccuracyPublished by Springer Nature ,1991
- Analysis of an empirical model for soil heat flux under a growing wheat crop for estimating evaporation by an infrared-temperature based energy balance equationAgricultural and Forest Meteorology, 1987
- Estimation of soil heat flux from net radiation during the growth of alfalfaAgricultural and Forest Meteorology, 1986
- The heat flux density in a non-homogeneous bare loessial soilBoundary-Layer Meteorology, 1972