Comparison of the usefulness of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and subendocardial resection in patients with sustained ventricular arrhythmias and poor regional wall motion associated with coronary artery disease
- 15 September 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 72 (9) , 652-657
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(93)90879-h
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of a regional wall motion score to enhance risk stratification of patients receiving an implantable cardioverter-defibrillatorJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1993
- Regional wall motion analysis predicts survival and functional outcome after subendocardial resection in patients with prior anterior myocardial infarction.Circulation, 1993
- Ventricular Tachycardia SurgeryJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 1992
- ICD Clinical Update: First Decade, Initial 10,000 PatientsPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1991
- Long-term outcome with the automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillatorJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1989
- The automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator as antiarrhythmic treatment modality of choice for survivors of cardiac arrest unrelated to acute myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1988
- Surgical ablation of ventricular tachycardia with sequential map-guided subendocardial resection: electrophysiologic assessment and long-term follow-up.Circulation, 1988
- Advantages and applications of the centerline method for characterizing regional ventricular function.Circulation, 1986
- Left ventricular volume and mass from single-plane cineangiocardiogram. A comparison of anteroposterior and right anterior oblique methodsAmerican Heart Journal, 1970
- The use of single plane angiocardiograms for the calculation of left ventricular volume in manAmerican Heart Journal, 1968