Systematic reviews of published evidence: Miracles or minefields?
- 1 July 1998
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Oncology
- Vol. 9 (7) , 703-709
- https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008335706631
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Putting trials on trial--the costs and consequences of small trials in depression: a systematic review of methodology.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1997
- The Cochrane Collaboration and Gynecologic OncologyInternational Journal of Gynecologic Cancer, 1997
- Breast cancer and hormonal contraceptives: collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 53 297 women with breast cancer and 100 239 women without breast cancer from 54 epidemiological studiesPublished by Elsevier ,1996
- Practical methodology of meta‐analyses (overviews) using updated individual patient dataStatistics in Medicine, 1995
- The Cochrane Collaboration: making the results of controlled trials properly accessiblePublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1993
- Review papers : The statistical basis of meta-analysisStatistical Methods in Medical Research, 1993
- Assessing the scientific quality of review articles.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1993
- Can meta-analyses be trusted?The Lancet, 1991
- Confronting publication bias: A cohort design for meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 1987
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986