A critique of current practice for the use of expert opinions in probabilistic risk assessment
- 31 December 1988
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Reliability Engineering & System Safety
- Vol. 20 (1) , 63-85
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0951-8320(88)90006-3
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparative study of differences in subjective likelihood estimates made by individuals, interacting groups, Delphi groups, and nominal groupsPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- The Assessment of Probability Distributions from Expert Opinions with an Application to Seismic Fragility CurvesRisk Analysis, 1986
- On Broadening Failure Rate Distributions in PRA Uncertainty AnalysesRisk Analysis, 1984
- When oracles fail—A comparison of four procedures for aggregating subjective probability forecastsOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1981
- Training for calibrationOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1980
- Data specialization for plant specific risk studiesNuclear Engineering and Design, 1980
- Do those who know more also know more about how much they know?Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1977
- Comparison of rules for aggregating subjective likelihood ratiosOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1974
- Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and BiasesScience, 1974
- Probabilistic forecasting: An experiment related to the stock marketOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1972