A New Method of Angiographic Runoff Evaluation in Femorodistal Reconstructions
- 1 August 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Surgery
- Vol. 125 (8) , 1055-1058
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1990.01410200119019
Abstract
• In 62 patients undergoing femorodistal bypass surgery, the foot vessel runoff was analyzed with a new grading system based on intraoperative postreconstruction serial angiography. The patients were divided into two groups according to the level of the distal anastomosis (proximal or low). Good runoff was defined as integrity of the anterior and/or posterior foot arch in proximal femorodistal grafts and integrity of both arches in low bypasses. In the proximal group, runoff was classified as poor when the arches were deficient or occluded, and in the low group, when only one arch was intact. The patency rate after 6 months was 81% in the good runoff group, whereas all grafts in patients with poor runoff were occluded. The new method allowed better prediction of the early outcome than does the primary and secondary pedal arch integrity concept. (Arch Surg. 1990;125:1055-1058)This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- In Situ Tibial Reconstruction State-of-the-Art or Passing FancyAnnals of Surgery, 1988
- Modern Results are Superior to or Equivalent to In-situ Bypass for Patency and for Vein UtilizationAnnals of Surgery, 1987
- EVALUATION OF GLUTARALDEHYDE-TANNED HUMAN UMBILICAL-CORD VEIN AS A VASCULAR PROSTHESIS FOR BYPASS TO POPLITEAL, TIBIAL, AND PERONEAL ARTERIES1978
- Femorotibial Vein BypassArchives of Surgery, 1973