Smoking Topography, Brand Switching, and Nicotine Delivery: Results from an In vivo Study
Open Access
- 1 June 2005
- journal article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
- Vol. 14 (6) , 1370-1375
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-04-0498
Abstract
Objective: Exposure to toxins in tobacco smoke is influenced by how a cigarette is smoked. Cigarettes have been designed to allow for a range of puffing behavior and to provide different, nonlinear tar and nicotine yields in response to different puffing profiles. However, puffing behavior and its influence upon risk-exposure has yet to be assessed outside the laboratory, in smokers' natural environment. Method: Fifty-nine adult smokers used a portable device to measure smoking topography over the course of three 1-week trials. Participants were asked to smoke their usual “regular yield” brand through the device for trial 1 and again, 6 weeks later, at trial 2. Half the subjects were then randomly assigned to switch to a “low-yield” brand for trial 3. Results: The findings show a high degree of stability in puffing behavior within the same subject over time but considerable variability between smokers. Smokers who were switched to a “low-yield” cigarette increased their total smoke intake per cigarette by 40% (P = 0.007), with no significant change in their salivary cotinine levels. Cigarettes smoked per day and nicotine yield were only weakly associated with salivary cotinine levels; however, salivary cotinine was strongly associated with a composite measure that included cigarettes per day, brand elasticity, and puffing behavior (sr = 0.61, P < 0.001). Conclusions: These findings provide strong evidence of behavioral compensation to low-yield cigarettes from in vivo measures of smoking behavior. The findings also show the importance of brand elasticity and smoking topography in predicting nicotine uptake and smoke exposure.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Smoking behaviour and toxin exposure during six weeks use of a potential reduced exposure product: OmniTobacco Control, 2004
- Effects of low nicotine content cigarettes on smoke intakeNicotine & Tobacco Research, 2004
- Tobacco-specific nitrosamines in tobacco from U.S. brand and non-U.S. brand cigarettesNicotine & Tobacco Research, 2003
- Cigarette filter ventilation is a defective design because of misleading taste, bigger puffs, and blocked ventsTobacco Control, 2002
- Variation within global cigarette brands in tar, nicotine, and certain nitrosamines: analytic studyTobacco Control, 2000
- Reduced smoking: an introduction and review of the evidenceAddiction, 2000
- Puffing behavior during the smoking of a single cigarette in a naturalistic environmentPharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 1992
- Influence of Smoking Fewer Cigarettes on Exposure to Tar, Nicotine, and Carbon MonoxideNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Smokers of Low-Yield Cigarettes Do Not Consume Less NicotineNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Zur Bestimmung des Nicotins im Tabakrauch. IIZeitschrift für Lebensmittel-Untersuchung und Forschung, 1933