Heads
- 1 March 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Linguistics
- Vol. 21 (1) , 1-29
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226700010008
Abstract
Recent work on morphology – Lieber, 1981; Williams, 1981; Kiparsky, 1982; and Selkirk, 1982, in particular – has extended the notion of HEAD from syntax into new areas in morphology. In particular, these writers propose that in forms with derivational affixes, like Englishhappiness, the affix is the head of the combination; for instance, Kiparsky assumes (following Lieber) ‘that all word formation is endocentric’, meaning by this ‘that the category of a derived word is always non-distinct from the category of its head, in English usually the rightmost constituent (cf. Williams, 1981)’ (133).Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Linguistic Categories: Auxiliaries and Related PuzzlesLanguage, 1985
- Lectures on Government and BindingLanguage, 1984
- A second attack on constituency: a reply to DahlLinguistics, 1980
- Some arguments for higher nodes in syntax: a reply to Hudson’s ‘Constituency and dependency’Linguistics, 1980
- Constituency and dependencyLinguistics, 1980
- Autonomous Syntax and the Analysis of AuxiliariesLanguage, 1977
- Dependency Structures and Transformational RulesLanguage, 1970
- Universals of LanguageThe Modern Language Review, 1964
- The Grammar of English NominalizationsLanguage, 1962
- Immediate ConstituentsLanguage, 1947