Effects of mizolastine and clemastine on actual driving and psychomotor performance in healthy volunteers
- 1 October 1994
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Vol. 47 (3) , 253-259
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02570505
Abstract
The acute effect of doses of mizolastine 5, 10, 20 and 40 mg, an active control (clemastine 2 mg) and placebo on actual car driving and psychomotor performance have been compared. Twenty four healthy volunteers were treated according to a double-blind, 6-way cross-over design. In the driving test, lasting about 1 h, lateral position control and speed were continuously measured; the psychomotor test battery, lasting 50 min, comprised critical flicker-fusion frequency, critical instability tracking, divided attention, memory search and choice reaction time, and vigilance studies; and mood changes and possible adverse-effects were rated on visual analogue scales. The results showed a dose-response relationship: mizolastine 40 and 20 mg impaired driving and psychomotor performance. The effect of mizolastine 40 mg on driving was strongly correlated with that of clemastine (r=0.78) and was comparable to the effect of a blood ethanol level of 0.8 mg·ml−1. Mizolastine 5 mg and 10 mg did not have a significant effect on driving performance and psychomotor tests. It was concluded that at a 10 mg dose of mizolastine, the therapeutic dose, it could be considered a safe antihistamine, although individual adverse reactions cannot be completely ruled out.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Acrivastine, terfenadine and diphenhydramine effects on driving performance as a function of dose and time after dosingEuropean Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1994
- Does cetirizine belong to the new generation of antihistamines? An investigation into its acute and subchronic effects on highway driving, psychometric test performance and daytime sleepinessHuman Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental, 1992
- An improved method for measuring drug effects on the Critical Fusion Frequency (CFF)European Neuropsychopharmacology, 1991
- A double-blind placebo controlled study of the psychometric effects of the SL 85.0324, a new H1 antagonist drag compared to terfenadhine and triprolidine in healthy subjectsEuropean Journal of Pharmacology, 1990
- CNS-pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of the new non-sedative H1-antagonist SL 85.0324 vs placebo and dimetinden in volunteersEuropean Journal of Pharmacology, 1990
- Driving performance under the influence of drugs: rationale for, and application of, a new test.British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1984
- Visual Sustained Attention: Image Degradation Produces Rapid Sensitivity Decrement Over TimeScience, 1983
- Diazepam Impairs Lateral Position Control in Highway DrivingScience, 1982
- The use of analogue scales in rating subjective feelingsPsychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 1974
- A non-parametric analysis of recognition experimentsPsychonomic Science, 1964