A Comparison of the Cellular Electrophysiology of Mexiletine and Sotalol, Singly and Combined, in Canine Purkinje Fibers
- 1 September 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology
- Vol. 12 (3) , 286-292
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005344-198809000-00005
Abstract
To determine if combinations of mexiletine and sotalol retain Class I and III electrophysiologic actions, using standard microelectrode techniques, we examined the electrophysiologic effects on canine Purkinje fibers of solutions of mexiletine (3.1–100 μM), sotalol (3.1–400 μM), and combinations of the two drugs, at stimulation frequencies of 1.5 and 2.0 Hz. The combinations consisted of 12.5 μM of one drug combined with 3.1, 12.5, and 50 μM of the other. Mexiletine caused a concentration dependent depression of Vmax, the degree of depression always being greater at the more rapid frequency. At concentrations above 50 μM, sotalol depressed Vmax slightly. Increasing the stimulation frequency did not result in further Vmax depression. The addition of sotalol did not alter the Vmax depression produced by mexiletine but prior exposure to sotalol attenuated the effect of subsequent mexiletine. Both drugs reduced action potential amplitude and in combination their effects on this parameter were additive. Sotalol prolonged and mexiletine shortened action potential duration. Low concentrations of mexiletine reversed the prolongation caused by sotalol, whereas the addition of sotalol did not alter the effect of mexiletine. Mexiletine shortened the effective refractory period at low concentrations and prolonged it at high concentrations. Sotalol prolonged the effective refractory period at all concentrations. Exposure to a low concentration of sotalol did not alter the effects on the effective refractory period of subsequent exposure to mexiletine but a low concentration of mexiletine reduced the prolongation from subsequent sotalol. Thus, the combination of mexiletine and sotalol may add a Class II action to the Class I effects of mexiletine but the mexiletine prevents the Class III effects of sotalol.This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evidence for a specific receptor site for lidocaine, quinidine, and bupivacaine associated with cardiac sodium channels in guinea pig ventricular myocardium.Circulation Research, 1985
- Effects of elevated extracellular potassium concentrations on the Class III antiarrhythmic action of sotalolCardiovascular Research, 1985
- ELECTROPHYSIOLOGIC AND VOLTAGE CLAMP ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF SOTALOL ON ISOLATED CARDIAC-MUSCLE AND PURKINJE-FIBERS1985
- Block of inactivated sodium channels and of depolarization-induced automaticity in guinea pig papillary muscle by amiodarone.Circulation Research, 1984
- FREQUENCY-DEPENDENT EFFECTS OF ANTIARRHYTHMIC DRUGS ON ACTION-POTENTIAL DURATION AND REFRACTORINESS OF CANINE CARDIAC PURKINJE-FIBERS1984
- Membrane action and catecholamine release action of bretylium tosylate in normoxic and hypoxic canine purkinje fibersJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1983
- Kinetics of onset of rate-dependent effects of Class I antiarrhythmic drugs are important in determining their effects on refractoriness in guinea-pig ventricle, and provide a theoretical basis for their subclassificationCardiovascular Research, 1983
- Shortening of the action potential and reduction of pacemaker activity by lidocaine, quinidine, and procainamide in sheep cardiac purkinje fibers. An effect on Na or K currents?Circulation Research, 1982
- Test of a model of antiarrhythmic drug action. Effects of quinidine and lidocaine on myocardial conduction.Circulation, 1980
- PROPRANOLOL EFFECTS ON MEMBRANE REPOLARIZATION TIME IN ISOLATED CANINE PURKINJE-FIBERS - THRESHOLD TISSUE CONTENT AND THE INFLUENCE OF EXPOSURE TIME1980