Ethical, logical and scientific problems with the new ICRP proposals
- 29 May 2002
- journal article
- Published by IOP Publishing in Journal of Radiological Protection
- Vol. 22 (2) , 149-161
- https://doi.org/10.1088/0952-4746/22/2/303
Abstract
Last year the ICRP proposed a new system of radiation protection designed to be simpler, more oriented toward individual protection and reflective of important ethical standards. This article argues that the proposal violates important norms of scientific simplicity, is in fact less protective of individuals than the current system and makes a number of ethical errors. After outlining 12 ethical errors, five logical errors and two scientific problems with the new ICRP proposal, the present authors suggest possible ways to remedy these deficiencies.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- A report on progress towards new recommendations: A communication from the International Commission on Radiological ProtectionJournal of Radiological Protection, 2001
- Control of low-level radiation exposure: time for a change?Journal of Radiological Protection, 1999
- The precautionary approach: Implications of the revision of the Oslo and Paris ConventionsMarine Policy, 1991