Does governance matter for aggregate health capital?
- 1 February 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Applied Economics Letters
- Vol. 15 (3) , 199-202
- https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850600721916
Abstract
The point of departure of our analysis is the seminal work of Rodgers ( 1979 Rodgers, GB . 1979. Income and inequality as determinants of mortality: an international cross-section analysis. Population Studies, 39: 343–51. [Google Scholar] ) on the absolute and relative income hypotheses. We find that substituting the governance index for the Gini index is statistically the preferred regression model. Our findings lend support to the argument that governance matters. Further investigation provides evidence for two types of threshold effects: in terms of both absolute income and governance. For those countries below a threshold, absolute income is the most significant determinant of health, while for those above it, governance matters the most. The regression analyses are conducted on a sample of 112 states, which is representative of a wide range of absolute income and governance levels.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Governance Matters III: Governance Indicators for 1996–2002Published by World Bank ,2003
- Unhealthy SocietiesPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2002
- Testing the specification of multivariate models in the presence of alternative hypothesesJournal of Econometrics, 1983
- Diagnostics for heteroscedasticity in regressionBiometrika, 1983
- A Simple Test for Heteroscedasticity and Random Coefficient VariationEconometrica, 1979
- Income and Inequality as Determinants of Mortality: An International Cross-Section AnalysisPopulation Studies, 1979