Cholesteatoma surgery: The influence of the canal wall

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Although there is an increasing awareness of the risks of complications following intact canal wall tympanoplasty (ICWT) for cholesteatoma, long-term evidence to support a preference for alternative techniques in which the canal wall having been removed, the resultant cavity is obliterated, is comparatively scarce. In order to clarify this uncertainty, long-term results with both operations have been analyzed to determine incidence rates for postoperative complications and functional results. Recurrent cholesteatoma (retraction pocket) has occurred in 14% of ICWT ears and 1% of ears with mastoid obliteration and tympanic reconstruction. The incidence of clinically detected residual disease with both operations has been extremely low so far, in spite of greater than 20% incidence of epithelial pearls at the second stage of separate planned two-stage procedures with each technique. It is concluded that reduction to the greatest degree possible of cholesteatomatous complications from tympanoplasty necessitates removal of the canal wall.