Perceptual versus physiological heat strain during exercise-heat stress
Top Cited Papers
- 1 September 2002
- journal article
- basic sciences
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Vol. 34 (9) , 1454-1461
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200209000-00009
Abstract
TIKUISIS, P., T. M. MCLELLAN, and G. SELKIRK. Perceptual versus physiological heat strain during exercise-heat stress. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 34, No. 9, pp. 1454–1461, 2002. Purpose The physiological strain index (PSI) has been proposed as a universally applicable measure of exercise-heat strain. Unknown is whether this index, based on normalized increases in core temperature and heart rate, is matched by its perceptual analog. Methods By using a similar mathematical construct to the PSI, the perceptions of thermal sensation and perceived exertion were combined, and the resultant index, PeSI, was compared with its physiological counterpart, denoted as PhSI, for the exercise-heat stress specific to this study. Twenty-six young and healthy subjects wore semi-impermeable clothing and walked (3.5 km·h−1) under hot conditions (40°C and 30% RH) until exhaustion or when their core temperature reached 39.5°C. Subjects were divided into two fitness groups [endurance trained (T) and untrained (U)] comprised of 10 men and 3 women each. U subjects had a higher level of body fatness (mean ± SD 18.1 ± 5.3 vs 12.6 ± 4.5%;P = 0.010) and a lower level of aerobic fitness (V̇O2max = 43.6 ± 3.8 ± vs 59.0 ± 6.2 mL·min−1·kg−1;P < 0.001). Results During the first hour of exposure, there was no group difference in PhSI, yet T perceived their physiological strain (PeSI) lower than U (P = 0.002). Further, the indices were not different for U whereas PhSI was higher than PeSI for T (P = 0.008). At the end of the exposure, T had a higher value of PhSI than U (8.23 ± 0.72 vs 6.74 ± 1.47;P = 0.002), but there was no group difference in PeSI. Although the indices were again not different for U, PhSI at the end was higher than PeSI for T (6.14 ± 1.68;P < 0.001). Conclusion T underestimated and U consistently perceived their physiological strain, as defined by PhSI, in accordance with the measured increases in core temperature and heart rate throughout an exposure to uncompensable exercise-heat stress.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cardiorespiratory and thermoregulatory response of working in fire-fighter protective clothing in a temperate environmentErgonomics, 2000
- Total body fat does not influence maximal aerobic capacityInternational Journal of Obesity, 2000
- Metabolic and thermodynamic responses to dehydration‐induced reductions in muscle blood flow in exercising humansThe Journal of Physiology, 1999
- Influence of body temperature on the development of fatigue during prolonged exercise in the heatJournal of Applied Physiology, 1999
- Heat acclimation, aerobic fitness, and hydration effects on tolerance during uncompensable heat stressJournal of Applied Physiology, 1998
- Effects of 6 versus 12 days of heat acclimation on heat tolerance in lightly exercising men wearing protective clothingEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology, 1995
- Application of the relative summary climatic indices during work in heat for ergonomic purposesErgonomics, 1989
- Seventy-five years of searching for a heat indexEnvironmental Research, 1980
- Comfort and thermal sensations and associated physiological responses at various ambient temperaturesEnvironmental Research, 1967
- Physiological index of strain and body heat storage in hyperthermiaJournal of Applied Physiology, 1960