Overestimation of the prevalence of antibody to hepatitis C virus in retrospective studies on stored sera

Open Access
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Serum samples (1,428) from 1,149 patients with chronic liver diseases and polytransfused subjects were tested for antibody to hepatitis C virus by first-generation enzyme immunoassays. Antibody to hepatitis C virus was detected in 87% of patients with transfusion-related chronic non-A, non-B hepatitis; 17.6% of patients with nonmalignant, chronic hepatitis B virus infection; 37.3% of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma; 14.3% of patients with alcoholic liver diseases; 22.2% of patients with cryptogenic cirrhosis; 76% of intravenous drug abusers; 16.4% of patients on hemodialysis; 1.8% of patients on peritoneal dialysis; 6.2% of kidney transplant recipients; and 3.1% of normal subjects. A high frequency of weakly positive results was found in “aged” samples: 61.9% of antibody to hepatitis C virus-positive patients whose sera had been stored for more than 2 yr had optical densities less than two times the cut-off values in contrast to 7.9% of those whose sera had been stored for less than 2 yr (p < 0.0001). A significantly lower proportion of patients who had optical densities less than two times the cut-off values were reactive in subsequent samples 27.5% vs. 87.5% (p < 0.0001). On retests, only 70% and 56% of sera that were initially positive for antibody to hepatitis C virus remained antibody to hepatitis C virus positive using second-generation enzyme immunoassays and neutralization enzyme immunoassays, respectively. Our results suggest that retrospective studies on stored sera may have overestimated the prevalence of antibody to hepatitis C virus. We recommend that care be exercised in the interpretation of the results of the first-generation enzyme immunoassays, especially with weakly positive results on “aged” sera. (Hepatology 1991;14:756-762).