Results of a clinical trial on care improvement for the critically ill
- 1 August 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 31 (8) , 2107-2117
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000069732.65524.72
Abstract
To develop, deploy, and evaluate an intervention designed to identify and mitigate conflict in decision making in the intensive care unit. Nonrandomized, controlled trial. Seven intensive care units at four Boston teaching hospitals. A total of 1,752 critically ill patients, including 873 study cases analyzed here. Social workers interviewed families of patients deemed at high risk for decisional conflict and provided feedback to the clinical team, who then implemented measures to address the problems identified. Patient or surrogate satisfaction with intensive care unit care and the probability of choosing a specific plan for treatment in the intensive care unit was studied. Inclusion criteria identified 873 patients at risk for decisional conflict. Thirty-nine percent of the patients in the intervention phase of the study (172 patients) received the intervention. In multivariate analyses, receiving the intervention significantly increased the likelihood of deciding to forgo resuscitation (odds ratio [OR] = 1.81, p =.017), the likelihood of choosing a treatment plan for comfort-care only (OR = 1.94, p =.018), and the likelihood of choosing an aggressive-care treatment plan (OR = 2.30, p =.002). Receiving the intervention did not significantly affect overall satisfaction with the care provided (OR = 0.68, p =.14), satisfaction with the amount of information provided (OR = 0.86, p =.44), or satisfaction with the degree of involvement in decision making (OR = 0.84, p =.54). Although there was no impact on patient or surrogate satisfaction with care provided in the intensive care unit, the intervention did facilitate deliberative decision making in cases deemed at high risk for conflict. The lessons learned from the experience with this intervention should be helpful in ongoing efforts to improve care and to achieve outcomes desired by critically ill patients, their families, and critical care clinicians.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- End-of-life care in the intensive care unit: Where are we now?Critical Care Medicine, 2001
- Rethinking Fundamental Assumptions: SUPPORT'S Implications for Future ReformJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2000
- Communication and Decision‐Making in Seriously Ill Patients: Findings of the SUPPORT ProjectJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2000
- Comparing utilization of life-sustaining treatments with patient and public preferencesJournal of General Internal Medicine, 1998
- Do Advance Directives Provide Instructions That Direct Care?Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1997
- Can Clinical Interventions Change Care at the End of Life?Annals of Internal Medicine, 1997
- A prospective study of the impact of patient preferences on life-sustaining treatment and hospital costCritical Care Medicine, 1996
- Preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitationJournal of General Internal Medicine, 1995
- How well is the patient self-determination act working?: An early assessmentThe American Journal of Medicine, 1993
- A Prospective Study of Advance Directives for Life-Sustaining CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991