Prognostic factors for patients with diffuse large cell or immunoblastic non‐Hodgkin's lymphomas: Experience of the non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma pathologic classification project
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Medical and Pediatric Oncology
- Vol. 18 (2) , 89-96
- https://doi.org/10.1002/mpo.2950180202
Abstract
Prognostic factors for long‐term survival of 312 patients with diffuse large cell or immunoblastic non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma are presented based on analysis of the multi‐institution clinicopathologic study sponsored by the National Cancer Institute. At the time of analysis, 75% of the patients had died and the median follow‐up for patients still alive was 11 years. The distribution of Ann Arbor stages was 21% stage 1, 32% stage 11, 17% stage III, and 30% stage IV. Factors of prognostic significance for survival included age, stage, histologic subtype, presence of B symptoms, size of the largest lesion, number of extra‐lymphoid organs involved, and extent of lymphatic involvement. Recursive partitioning analysis suggested a prognostic classification system based on stage, age, size of the largest lesion, and presence of mediastinal involvement. Stage I patient <50 years of age had a 10 year survival rate of 65% compared to 36% for older stage I patients. Stage II patients <65 years old without bulky lesions or mediastinal involvement had a 10 year survival rate of 45% compared to 10% for the poorer risk stage II patients. Although statistically significant prognostic factors were identified for the stage III/IV patients, they were not strong discriminants of 5–10 year survival rate. Because of the correlation among potential prognostic factors, there is no uniquely best classification system. Reasons for discrepancies among reported prognostic factor analyses are discussed, and a prognostic grouping that synthesizes our results with those of others is proposed.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why Predictive Indexes Perform Less Well in Validation StudiesArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1987
- Identification of Major Prognostic Subgroups of Patients with Large-Cell Lymphoma Treated with m-BACOD or M-BACODAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1986
- Prognostic indicators in diffuse large-cell (histiocytic) lymphomaInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1986
- Role of radiation therapy in localized non-Hodgkin's lymphomaRadiotherapy and Oncology, 1985
- Improved survival following combined radiation therapy and chemotherapy for unfavorable prognosis stage I-II non-Hodgkin's lymphomas.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1985
- Heterogeneity of response and survival in diffuse histiocytic lymphoma after bacop therapy (bleomycin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone)Hematological Oncology, 1985
- Classification of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Reproducibility of major classification systemsCancer, 1985
- Predicting therapeutic outcome in patients with diffuse histiocytic lymphoma treated with cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP)Cancer, 1982
- National cancer institute sponsored study of classifications of non-hodgkin's lymphomas. Summary and description of a working formulation for clinical usageCancer, 1982
- Prognostic factors for advanced diffuse histiocytic lymphoma following treatment with combination chemotherapyThe American Journal of Medicine, 1977