beta Blockers in heart failure: a comparison of a vasodilating beta blocker with metoprolol
Open Access
- 1 January 1998
- Vol. 79 (1) , 86-92
- https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.79.1.86
Abstract
Objective To determine whether a third generation vasodilating β blocker (celiprolol) has long term clinical advantages over metoprolol in patients with chronic heart failure. Design A double blind placebo controlled randomised trial. Setting University teaching Hospital. Patients 50 patients with stable chronic heart failure (NYHA class II-IV) due to idiopathic dilated, ischaemic, or hypertensive cardiomyopathy, with left ventricular ejection fraction < 0.45. Interventions Celiprolol 200 mg daily (n = 21), metoprolol 50 mg twice daily (n = 19), or placebo (n = 10) for three months with a four week dose titration period. After the double blind period, patients entered an open label study (with placebo group receiving β blockers) and were assessed after one year. Main outcome measures Clinical response, efficacy, and tolerance were assessed by the Minnesota heart failure symptom questionnaire, six minute walk test, Doppler echocardiography (systolic and diastolic function), radionuclide ventriculography, and atrial and brain natriuretic peptides measured at baseline and after three months. Results In the metoprolol group at 12 weeksv baseline there was a 47% reduction in symptom score (p < 0.001), improvement of NYHA class (mean (SEM), 2.6 (0.12) to 1.9 (0.13), p = 0.001), exercise distance (1246 (54) to 1402 (52) feet, p < 0.001), and left ventricular ejection fraction (26.9(3.1)% to 31(3.0)%, p = 0.016), and a fall in heart rate (resting, 79 (3) to 62 (3) beats/min, p < 0.001). In the celiprolol group there was a 38% reduction in symptom score (p = 0.02), less improvement in exercise distance (1191 (55) to 1256 (61) feet, p = 0.05), and no significant changes in NYHA class, left ventricular ejection fraction, or heart rate. Mortality at one year was 11% in metoprolol and 19% in the celiprolol group, and symptomatic improvement was maintained in the survivors. Conclusions Both drugs were well tolerated but the vasodilator properties of celiprolol do not seem to provide any obvious additional benefit in the long term treatment of heart failure.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Analysis of left ventricular diastolic functionHeart, 1996
- β-Adrenergic Blockers and Survival in Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- The Effect of Carvedilol on Morbidity and Mortality in Patients with Chronic Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Effect of low dose beta blockers on atrial and ventricular (B type) natriuretic factor in heart failure: a double blind, randomised comparison of metoprolol and a third generation vasodilating beta blocker.Heart, 1995
- Quantitative hemodynamics by Doppler echocardiography: A noninvasive alternative to cardiac catheterizationProgress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 1994
- Beneficial effects of metoprolol in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathyThe Lancet, 1993
- Beta adrenoreceptor subtype cross regulation in the human heart.Heart, 1993
- Plasma Norepinephrine as a Guide to Prognosis in Patients with Chronic Congestive Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Plasma norepinephrine in congestive heart failurePublished by Elsevier ,1978
- Effect of chronic beta-adrenergic receptor blockade in congestive cardiomyopathy.Heart, 1975