EEMCO guidance for the assessment of skin topography1
- 1 March 1999
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
- Vol. 12 (2) , 103-114
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3083.1999.tb00998.x
Abstract
Numerous factors can modify the visibility or the actual dimensions of the skin microrelief and wrinkles. To quantify these changes, several methods, including clinical and non‐invasive ones, have been proposed. This article reviews the advantages et drawbacks of all of them and lists some experimental recommendations to make the results of studies using these methods, more reliable.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Direct profilometry of the skin: its reproducibility and variabilityJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 1995
- The Surface of the Skin — The MicroreliefPublished by Springer Nature ,1993
- (3) HTLV-1-associated lymphoma presenting in the skinBritish Journal of Dermatology, 1992
- Extension-induced Changes in the Microrelief of the Human Volar Forearm: Variations With AgeJournal of Gerontology, 1991
- Topical tretinoin for treatment of photodamaged skin. A multicenter studyArchives of Dermatology, 1991
- The treatment of visible signs of senescence: the Italian experienceBritish Journal of Dermatology, 1990
- Relationship of solar keratosis and history of skin cancer to objective measures of actinic skin damageBritish Journal of Dermatology, 1984
- Assessment of skin surface by scanning densitometry of macrophotographsClinical and Experimental Dermatology, 1983
- Drugs which influence the stratum corneum and techniques for their evaluation*Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, 1981
- Surfometry.British Journal of Dermatology, 1975