SOLAR POWER
- 2 July 1990
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Contemporary Economic Policy
- Vol. 8 (3) , 240-254
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.1990.tb00656.x
Abstract
This paper describes categories of solar technologies and identijies those that are economic. It compares the private costs of power from solar, wind, nuclear, coal, oil, and gas generators. In the southern United States, the private costs of building and generating electricity from new solar and wind power plants are less than the private cost of electricity from a new nuclear power plant. Solar power is more valuable than nuclear power since all solar power is available during peak and mid‐peak periods. Half of the power from nuclear generators is off‐peak power and therefore is less valuable. Reliability is important in determining the value of wind and nuclear power. Damage from air pollution, when factored into the cost of power from fossil fuels, alters the cost comparison in favor of solar and wind power. Some policies are more effective at encouraging alternative energy technologies that pollute less and improve national security.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- LEVELIZED COST OF ELECTRICITY GENERATION TECHNOLOGIESContemporary Economic Policy, 1990
- Photovoltaics Today and TomorrowScience, 1989
- Comparative Energy Policy: The Economics of Nuclear Power in Japan and the United StatesThe Energy Journal, 1988
- Investment in alternative electricity supply plans by publicly owned utilitiesResources and Energy, 1984