Reversal of Atrial Mechanical Stunning After Cardioversion of Atrial Arrhythmias
- 1 October 2002
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 106 (14) , 1806-1813
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000032262.31520.e5
Abstract
Background— Atrial mechanical stunning develops on termination of chronic atrial arrhythmias and is implicated in the genesis of thromboembolic complications after cardioversion. The mechanisms responsible for atrial mechanical stunning are unknown. The effects of atrial rate, isoproterenol, and calcium on atrial mechanical function in patients with atrial stunning have not been evaluated, and it is not known if atrial stunning can be reversed. Methods and Results— Thirty-five patients with chronic atrial flutter (AFL) undergoing radiofrequency ablation were studied. Fifteen patients in sinus rhythm undergoing ablation for paroxysmal AFL were studied as control for effects of the procedure. Left atrial appendage emptying velocities (LAAEVs) and spontaneous echocardiographic contrast (LASEC) were assessed by transesophageal echocardiography during AFL, after reversion to sinus rhythm, during atrial pacing at cycle lengths of 750 to 250 ms, after a postpacing pause, and with isoproterenol or calcium. With termination of AFL, LAAEV decreased from 59.0±3.7 cm/s to 18.8±1.4 cm/s ( P P P P =0.005). Isoproterenol and calcium reversed atrial mechanical stunning with LAAEV increasing to 89.3±12.6 cm/s ( P =0.0007) and 50.2±10.5 cm/s ( P =0.005), respectively, and LASEC grade decreasing to 0.2±0.1 ( P =0.001) and 1.4±0.2 ( P =0.01), respectively. The postpacing pause increased LAAEV to 69.3±3.7 cm/s ( P Conclusion— Atrial mechanical stunning can be reversed by pacing at increased rates and through the administration of isoproterenol or calcium. These findings suggest a functional contractile apparatus in the mechanically remodeled atrium as a result of chronic atrial flutter.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Atrial fibrillation-induced atrial contractile dysfunction: a tachycardiomyopathy of a different sortCardiovascular Research, 2002
- Left atrial appendage flow velocities in subjects with normal left ventricular functionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2000
- Left atrial “stunning” following radiofrequency catheter ablation of chronic atrial flutterJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1998
- Left Atrial Appendage “Stunning” After Electrical Cardioversion of Atrial Flutter: An Attenuated Response Compared With Atrial Fibrillation as the Mechanism for Lower Susceptibility to Thromboembolic EventsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1997
- Prevention of recurrent atrial fibrillation with chronic dual-site right atrial pacingJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1996
- Left atrial appendage “stunning” after spontaneous conversion of atrial fibrillation demonstrated by transesophageal Doppler echocardiographyAmerican Heart Journal, 1995
- Aggravation of postcardioversion atrial dysfunction by sotalolJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1995
- Relations between left atrial appendage blood flow velocity, spontaneous echocardiographic contrast and thromboembolic risk in vivoJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1994
- Transesophageal echocardiography before and during direct current cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: Evidence for “atrial stunning” as a mechanism of thromboembolic complicationsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1994
- Impact of electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation on left atrial appendage function and spontaneous echo contrast: Characterization by simultaneous transesophageal echocardiographyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1993