Bioavailability and Antioxidant Activity of Some Food Supplements in Men and Women Using the D-Roms Test as a Marker of Oxidative Stress
Open Access
- 1 December 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Nutrition
- Vol. 131 (12) , 3208-3211
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/131.12.3208
Abstract
Most antioxidants show contradictory behaviors because in the biological environment, for unpredictable reasons, they can become prooxidants. Recently, a new simple method to monitor oxidative stress in serum was developed. This test detects the derivatives of reactive oxygen metabolites (D-Roms). Hydroperoxides are converted into radicals that oxidize N,N-diethyl-para-phenylendiamine and that can be detected through spectrophotometric procedures as U.CARR. (Carratelli units). One U.CARR. corresponds to 0.8 mg/L hydrogen peroxide. In normal subjects U.CARR. values range from 250 to 300. Values outside this range indicate a modification of the prooxidant/antioxidant ratio. On the basis of this method, we tested three different formulas of antioxidants (F1, F2, F3) in 14 apparently healthy volunteers (11 men and 3 women). Formula 1 was composed of 5 mg zinc, 48 μg selenium, 400 μg vitamin A (as retinol acetate), 50 μg β-carotene, 15 mg vitamin E (as dl-α-tocopheryl acetate) and 10 mg L-cysteine. Formula 2 was composed of 30 mg bioflavonoids from citrus, 30 mg vitamin C (as L-ascorbic acid), 10 mg coenzyme Q10 and 1 mg vitamin B-6 (as pyridoxine hydrochloride). Formula 3 was composed of Formula 1 plus Formula 2. Each formula was prepared in dry capsules (formulation D1, D2, D3) or in a fluid form (formulation P1, P2, P3). Each formulation was administered for 1 wk in a crossover design. A 15% deviation of U.CARR. levels was chosen as the cut-off value for a significant change in oxidative stress. Formulas F1 and F3 reduced mean U.CARR. levels in most of the treated subjects (t test, P < 0.05), whereas F2 was not active. Fluid formulations were more active than dry formulations (χ2 test, P < 0.05). In some cases, a slight increase in oxidative stress was detected. These minimal increases were not related to any particular antioxidant formula. In one subject only, the administration of the dry formulation (D1), increased oxidative stress to a level that reached the cut-off value. In conclusion, when antioxidants are taken in combination at low dosages they reduce oxidative stress, and little relevant prooxidant activity is detectable.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- The radical cation of N,N-diethyl-para-phenylendiamine: A possible indicator of oxidative stress in biological samplesResearch on Chemical Intermediates, 2000
- Dietary Antioxidant Vitamins and Death from Coronary Heart Disease in Postmenopausal WomenNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Lack of Effect of Long-Term Supplementation with Beta Carotene on the Incidence of Malignant Neoplasms and Cardiovascular DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Effects of a Combination of Beta Carotene and Vitamin A on Lung Cancer and Cardiovascular DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Benefits and Liabilities of Vitamin A and CarotenoidsJournal of Nutrition, 1996
- Free radicals, antioxidants, and human disease: curiosity, cause, or consequence?The Lancet, 1994
- The antioxidant supplement mythThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1994
- Dietary antioxidant flavonoids and risk of coronary heart disease: the Zutphen Elderly StudyThe Lancet, 1993
- Vitamin E Consumption and the Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in MenNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Amino Acids, Including Asparagine and Glutamine, in Plasma and Urine of Normal Human SubjectsExperimental Biology and Medicine, 1969