In search of the evidence: informing effective practice
- 1 January 1996
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Journal of Clinical Effectiveness
- Vol. 1 (1) , 25-29
- https://doi.org/10.1108/eb020833
Abstract
Despite the abundant journal literature the challenge for the health care professional is in retrieving clinically relevant information. Critical appraisal is a useful tool in meeting this challenge. This article examines the five stages of the critical appraisal process and the information implications associated with each stage. The role of health information workers, together with their training and development requirements, is also outlined. Clinicians and information workers need to work together to provide further evidence in support of the effectiveness of literature‐based approaches and their contribution to patient care.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- On the need for evidence‐based medicineHealth Economics, 1995
- Evidence-Based Medicine: Why All The Fuss?Annals of Internal Medicine, 1995
- Finding the evidenceHealth Libraries Review, 1994
- Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviewsBMJ, 1994
- Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting Clinically Sound Studies in MEDLINEJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1994
- The UK cochrane centre and the nhs centre for reviews and dissemination: Respective Roles Within the Information Systems Strategy of the NHS R&D Programme, Coordination and Principles Underlying CollaborationHealth Economics, 1994
- Users' Guides to the Medical LiteratureJAMA, 1993
- Where is the wisdom...?BMJ, 1991
- Impact of a Medical Journal Club on House-Staff Reading Habits, Knowledge, and Critical Appraisal SkillsJAMA, 1988
- Information Needs in Office Practice: Are They Being Met?Annals of Internal Medicine, 1985