Ought We to Require Emotional Capacity as Part of Decisional Competence?
- 1 December 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Project MUSE in Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
- Vol. 8 (4) , 377-387
- https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.1998.0024
Abstract
The preceding commentary by Louis Charland suggests that traditional cognitive views of decision-making competence err in not taking into account patients’ emotional capacities. Examined closely, however, Charland’s argument fails to escape the cognitive bias that he condemns. However, there may be stronger arguments for broadening the focus of competence assessment to include emotional capacities, centering on the ways in which emotions aid humans in processing information. Before emotional capacities are added to the list of functions essential for decisional competence, though, the feasibility and utility of such a reorientation must be demonstrated.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Appreciation and Emotion: Theoretical Reflections on the MacArthur Treatment Competence StudyKennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 1998
- The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study. III: Abilities of patients to consent to psychiatric and medical treatments.Law and Human Behavior, 1995
- The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study. II: Measures of abilities related to competence to consent to treatment.Law and Human Behavior, 1995
- The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study. I: Mental illness and competence to consent to treatment.Law and Human Behavior, 1995
- Deciding for Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making.Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 1992