Coerced Confessions, Judicial Instruction, and Mock Juror Verdicts1
- 1 December 1981
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Applied Social Psychology
- Vol. 11 (6) , 489-506
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1981.tb00838.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prior Confessions and Mock Juror Verdicts1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1980
- On the requirements of proof: The timing of judicial instruction and mock juror verdicts.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979
- On the requirements of proof: The timing of judicial instruction and mock juror verdicts.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979
- Effects of Presentation Mode Upon Mock Jurors' Reactions to a TrialPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1979
- Reducing the effects of juror bias.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1978
- Effects of Inadmissible Evidence and Level of Judicial Admonishment to Disregard on the Judgments of Mock Jurors1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1977
- Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.Psychological Review, 1977
- Effects of inadmissible Evidence on the Decisions of Simulated Jurors: A Moral DilemmaJournal of Applied Social Psychology, 1973
- Order of Presentation at TrialThe Yale Law Journal, 1972
- Quantifying Burdens of Proof: A View from the Bench, the Jury, and the ClassroomLaw & Society Review, 1971