Model for collecting colorectal cancer staging information in Western Australia
- 29 September 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Anz Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 74 (10) , 895-899
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-1433.2004.03199.x
Abstract
Background: There is recognition that to improve the management of patients with cancer we need to monitor outcomes, especially survival outcomes based on tumour stage. Unfortunately, there are few centres in Australia that can provide stage stratified survival information, despite the large investments that have been made in data collection. The aim of this study was to collect staging information for all colorectal cancers diagnosed in Western Australia over a 12‐month period. This information could then serve as a basis for more meaningful analysis.Methods: A project officer was appointed to coordinate a programme through the Western Australian Cancer Registry. A consensus was reached among pathologists on the standardized reporting of colorectal cancers to the registry. Clinicians were asked to provide, on pathology request forms, information on tumour location, the presence of metastatic disease (on X‐ray or at laparotomy), and type of surgery. Use was also made of existing hospital and unit based databases to acquire and crosscheck information.Results: Over a 12‐month study period, 1008 patients with colorectal cancers were notified to the Cancer Registry. Their mean age was 69.1 years (range 23−100 years), 56% were men and 44% women. The rectum was the most common site for disease location (32.5%). At cessation of the project, 743 patients (74%) were fully staged, with a further 221 patients (22%) having completed data on tumour depth of penetration and nodal status, but insufficient information on the presence of metastases. The stage distributions were: stage I − 20.5%; stage II − 29.9%; stage III − 26.2%; stage IV − 23.4%.Conclusions: It is feasible to collect staging information on colorectal cancers notified to a population based cancer registry. This information will be invaluable for stage stratified survival analysis and research.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Lymph Node Retrieval and Assessment in Stage II Colorectal Cancer: A Population-Based StudyAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2003
- Colon Cancer Survival Is Associated With Increasing Number of Lymph Nodes Analyzed: A Secondary Survey of Intergroup Trial INT-0089Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Multimodal CME for Surgeons and Pathologists Improves Colon Cancer StagingJournal of Cancer Education, 2003
- TNM Classification of Malignant TumoursPublished by Wiley ,2003
- A POPULATION‐BASED STUDY OF THE INCIDENCE, MORTALITY AND OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS FOLLOWING SURGERY FOR COLORECTAL CANCER IN WESTERN AUSTRALIAAnz Journal of Surgery, 2000
- Lothian Surgical Audit: a 15-year experience of improvement in surgical practice through regional computerised auditThe Lancet, 1997
- A COMMUNITY‐BASED HOSPITAL EXPERIENCE WITH COLORECTAL CANCERAnz Journal of Surgery, 1997
- Lothian and borders large bowel cancer project: Immediate outcome after surgery. The consultant surgeons and pathologists of the lothian and borders health boardsBritish Journal of Surgery, 1995
- Clinicopathological staging for colorectal cancer: An International Documentation System (IDS) and an International Comprehensive Anatomical Terminology (ICAT)Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 1991