Underwater observations on escallop (Pecten maximus L.) beds
- 1 February 1956
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom
- Vol. 35 (3) , 555-562
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0025315400010419
Abstract
In an age-frequency distribution plot of a biological population, it is axiomatic that there should be, in general, a preponderance of young. This expected distribution is not found when sampling some marine animals, notably lobsters and escallops. Many workers, including Priol (1930), Tang (1941), Elmhirst (1945), Baird (1952), Fairbridge (1953), and Mason have noted the absence ofyoung escallops (Pecten sp.) in the expected numbers in dredge hauls.A dredge without teeth, lined with sprat netting, was used at Brixham in an attempt to catch the young escallops, but this dredge filled so quickly with sand, gravel and shell that very few escallops were caught, although those taken did have a generally lower size-range than the escallops caught with a standard toothed dredge. At Castletownbere (Co. Cork) a naturalist's dredge similarly failed to catch many escallops.This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tagging of Escallops (Pecten maximus, L.) in IrelandICES Journal of Marine Science, 1953
- A Population Study of the Tasmanian "Commercial" Scallop, Notovola meridionalis (Tate) (Lamellibranchiata, Pectinidae)Marine and Freshwater Research, 1953