Adaptive Signal Processing, Hierarchy, and Budgetary Control in Federal Regulation
- 1 June 1996
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 90 (2) , 283-302
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2082885
Abstract
Control over agency budgets is a critical tool of political influence in regulatory decision making, yet the causal mechanism of budgetary control is unclear. Do budgetary manipulations influence agencies by imposing resource constraints or by transmitting powerful signals to the agency? I advance and test a stochastic process model of adaptive signal processing by a hierarchical agency to address this question. The principal findings of the paper are two. First, presidents and congressional committees achieve budgetary control over agencies not by manipulating aggregate resource constraints but by transmitting powerful signals through budget shifts. Second, bureaucratic hierarchy increases the agency's response time in processing budgetary signals, limiting the efficacy of the budget as a device of political control. I also show that the magnitude of agency response to budgetary signals increased for executive-branch agencies after 1970 due to executive oversight reforms. I conclude by discussing the limits of budgetary manipulations as a device of political control and the response of elected authorities to adaptive signal processing by agencies.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Agenda For Econometric Model BuildingPolitical Analysis, 1991
- Agency Budgets, Cost Information, and AuditingAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1989
- An Adaptive Model of Bureaucratic PoliticsAmerican Political Science Review, 1985
- Regulation: Politics, Bureaucracy, and EconomicsJournal of Policy Analysis and Management, 1985
- A Rational Expectations Approach to Macroeconometrics: Testing Policy Ineffectiveness and Efficient-Markets Models.Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1984
- Hierarchy and Ecological Control in Federal Budgetary Decision MakingAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1981
- Managing Garbage Can HierarchiesAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1980
- An efficient two-step estimator for the dynamic adjustment model with autoregressive errorsJournal of Econometrics, 1974
- An Argument for the Usefulness of the Gamma Distributed Lag ModelInternational Economic Review, 1974
- Democracy in the Administrative State. By Emmett S. Redford. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1969. Pp. 211. $5.00; paper, $2.25.)American Political Science Review, 1969