Diagnosis of infection after total hip replacement
- 26 April 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials
- Vol. 70B (1) , 139-145
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30030
Abstract
Subclinical infection in patients with pain following total hip replacement (THR) is an underestimated condition that needs consideration because it mimics aseptic loosening, contributes to periprosthetic osteolysis, and necessitates proper treatment. We aimed to define the reliability of diagnostic parameters that are routinely used before revision surgery for the assessment of infection. A continuous series of 26 subjects who underwent THR revision surgery was considered, including 21 cases diagnosed as aseptic loosening (group A) and 5 hip revisions with a clinical diagnosis for infection (group B). Seven subjects at the time of the primary arthroplasty were used as negative controls (group C). Technetium‐99m labeled hydroxymethylene diphosphonate [(99m)Tc‐HDP]‐ and technetium‐99m hexamethylpropyleneamine oxide [(99m)Tc‐HMPAO)]‐labeled granulocyte scintigraphy, histology of peri‐implant tissues, laboratory tests for inflammation, and microbiology were performed. Scintigraphy was positive for loosening [positive (99m)Tc‐HDP scan] but negative for infection [negative (99m)Tc‐HMPAO‐labeled granulocyte scan] in all group A patients, whereas in 11 cases (52%) a positive culture was unexpectedly obtained. Histology showed conflicting results: Polymorphonuclear cells (PMNs) were found only in 5 of 11 culture‐positive patients, whereas in 2 cases the presence of PMNs did not correspond to a positive culture. In group B patients, both isotope scans and microbiology were found to be positive. All control subjects (group C) had negative cultures. In our opinion, smoldering infection could be present in a significant proportion of cases of failed hip implants currently diagnosed as “nonseptic.” The inflammatory response to wear debris and the presence of superimposed, slowly growing bacteria could act synergically, both contributing to the pathogenesis of periprosthetic osteolysis. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 70B: 139–145, 2004Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bone-resorptive effects of endotoxincontaminated high-density polyethylene particles spontaneously eliminated in vivoThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2002
- Adherent Endotoxin on Orthopedic Wear Particles Stimulates Cytokine Production and Osteoclast DifferentiationJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2001
- The Prevention of Prosthetic Infection Using a Cross-Linked Albumin in a Rabbit ModelThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1997
- Induction of NO Synthesis by Lipoteichoic Acid fromStaphylococcus aureusin J774 Macrophages: Involvement of a CD14-Dependent PathwayBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1997
- Arthroplasty implant biomaterial particle associated macrophages differentiate into lacunar bone resorbing cells.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1996
- Size and shape of biomaterial wear debrisClinical Materials, 1994
- Bacterial Colonization of Orthopedic Fixation Devices in the Absence of Clinical InfectionThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1988
- Results of histological grading on 100 cases of hip prosthesis failureBiomaterials, 1988
- Significance of Operative Cultures in Total Hip ArthroplastyPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1986
- One Day versus Seven Days of Preventive Antibiotic Therapy in Orthopedic SurgeryClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1983