Clinical outcomes assessment in multiple sclerosis
- 1 September 1996
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Annals of Neurology
- Vol. 40 (3) , 469-479
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410400321
Abstract
This article represents initial deliberation of an international task force appointed by the US National Multiple Sclerosis Society to develop recommendations for optimal clinical assessment tools for multiple sclerosis clinical trials. Presented within this article are the key issues identified by the task force during its initial year of deliberation. These include the precise purpose for a clinical assessment tool, the clinical dimensions to be measured in a multidimensional outcome measure, desirable attributes of an optimal clinical outcome measure, the complexities of multidimensional outcome measures, the relative merits of categorical clinical ratings and quantitative functional assessments, and a number of other important design issues that relate to the use of a multidimensional outcome measure. An action plan for analysis of existing data is summarized, as are the plans for more detailed recommendations from the task force.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instrumentsPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Copolymer 1 reduces relapse rate and improves disability in relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosisNeurology, 1995
- Structural equation modeling with longitudinal data: Strategies for examining group differences and reciprocal relationships.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1994
- A further refinement of the reliable change (RC) index by improving the pre-post difference score: Introducing RCIDBehaviour Research and Therapy, 1993
- The analysis of change: Issues, fallacies, and new ideas.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1993
- Neuroperformance Evaluation of Multiple Sclerosis Disease Progression in a Clinical Trial: Implications for Neurological OutcomesNeurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 1993
- Measures of Effect Size in the Reporting of Rehabilitation ResearchAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 1991
- Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: An analogy to diagnostic test performanceJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1986
- Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosisNeurology, 1983
- QUANTITATIVE CLINICAL NEUROLOGICAL TESTING. I. A STUDY OF A BATTERY OF TESTS DESIGNED TO EVALUATE IN PART THE NEUROLOGICAL FUNCTION OF PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND ITS USE IN A THERAPEUTIC TRIAL*Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1965