Impact of contrast echocardiography on diagnostic algorithms: Pharmacoeconomic implications
Open Access
- 1 October 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Clinical Cardiology
- Vol. 20 (S1) , 39-48
- https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.4960201309
Abstract
The major goal of medicine in the era of managed care is to control escalating costs and to attain a high level of quality health care. Capitation has limited access to expensive and unnecessary testing, placing an emphasis on the prudent use of available technology. A vast armamentarium of available diagnostic screening tests are available within cardiology. Routine two-dimensional (2-D) echocardiography is a high-quality, low-cost test that provides enhanced portability and real-time test interpretation over other noninvasive test modalities. The echocardiogram may cost up to 50% less than competitive nuclear single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging. However, on average 10% of routine and 33% of stress echocardiograms are suboptimal (disproportionately affecting obese patients and those with lung disease). Myocardial contrast echocardiography has been shown to provide enhanced endocardial border delineation and left ventricular opacification, to enhance Doppler signal, and to provide information on myocardial perfusion. In several recent phase II and III studies, the use of a contrast agent has been shown to improve the diagnostic accuracy of echocardiography substantially. Improvements in the diagnostic capabilities of echocardiography have been shown to (1) impact upon downstream repetitive testing in patients with an initially nondiagnostic echocardiogram, (2) potentially increase laboratory throughput, and (3) reduce the rate of false-positive and negative tests as a result of improved image quality. As clinical and cost-effectiveness parallel one another, the use of myocardial contrast echocardiography in selected patient cohorts will result in improved diagnostic accuracy and a cost-effective pattern of care.Keywords
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measurement of right ventricular ejection fraction by contrast echocardiographyInternational Journal of Cardiology, 1997
- A metaanalysis of predischarge risk stratification after acute myocardial infarction with stress electrocardiographic, myocardial perfusion, and ventricular function imagingThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1996
- Prognostic value of simultaneous perfusion and function assessment using technetium-99m sestamibiThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1996
- Sex-specific differences in coronary artery disease risk factors, evaluation, and treatment: Have they been adequately evaluated?American Heart Journal, 1996
- A multicenter study of 11,372 patients to examine cost-effective strategies for diagnosis of coronary artery diseaseJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1996
- How good is echocardiography at assessing myocardial viability?The American Journal of Cardiology, 1995
- Incremental value of prognostic testing in patients with known or suspected ischemic heart disease: A basis for optimal utilization of exercise technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomographyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1995
- Comparison of modalities to diagnose coronary artery diseaseSeminars in Nuclear Medicine, 1994
- Echocardiography and coronary artery diseaseThe International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 1993
- Differences in electrocardiographic response to exercise of women and men: a non-Bayesian factor.Circulation, 1979