Retention of Anchor and Passive Integrated Transponder Tags by Arctic Grayling
- 1 November 1999
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in North American Journal of Fisheries Management
- Vol. 19 (4) , 1147-1150
- https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8675(1999)019<1147:roaapi>2.0.co;2
Abstract
Double-tagging experiments provide the necessary information to evaluate the relative merits of different tag types, as well as information for the correction of population dynamics parameters such as population estimates and survival. We initiated a double-tagging experiment in 1993 to evaluate the relative merits of passive integrated transponder (PIT) and anchor tags for tagging Arctic grayling Thymallus arcticus. Tag retention was best represented by power curves for both tag types. Instantaneous losses were higher for PIT tags (7% and 14%, respectively, for anchor and PIT tags). Despite this initial disparity, tag retention was very similar between the two tag types after 3 years (85% and 83%, respectively, for anchor and PIT tags). Loss of anchor tags accelerated over time while loss of PIT tags remained reasonably constant. We estimated that half the anchor tags would be lost within 6 years and that all would be lost within 8 years. In contrast, it would take 11 years for half the PIT tags...Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Retention of T-Bar Anchor Tags and Passive Integrated Transponder Tags by Gulf SturgeonsNorth American Journal of Fisheries Management, 1996
- Comparison of Three Nonlinear Models to Describe Long-Term Tag Shedding by Lake TroutTransactions of the American Fisheries Society, 1996
- Biological Responses of a Tundra River to FertilizationEcology, 1993
- Notes: A Morphological Explanation for Size-Dependent Anchor Tag Loss from Striped BassTransactions of the American Fisheries Society, 1990
- Long-term retention of floy tags by Arctic Grayling, Thymallus arcticusThe Canadian Field-Naturalist, 1985
- Bias and Loss of Precision Due to Tag Loss in Jolly–Seber Estimates for Mark–Recapture ExperimentsCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1981